Each project will be reviewed using the rubric below. Scores range from 0 (Missing) to 4 (Outstanding). Overall scores determine medals: Gold (90–100%), Silver (75–89%), Bronze (60–74%).
| Criteria | Missing (0) | Needs Work (1) | Fair (2) | Good (3) | Outstanding (4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Problem Identification & Impact | No problem stated | Vague or underdeveloped | Some clarity and relevance | Clear real-world alignment | Deep insight, strongly researched and relevant |
| AI & Technical Implementation | No meaningful AI use | Basic or incorrect implementation | Some relevance but limited use | Functional and relevant AI use | Well-integrated, innovative, technically sound |
| Functionality & User Testing | Non-functional or missing | Partially working, little testing | Functional, limited feedback used | Functional and improved through testing | Robust, refined via thorough iteration |
| Creativity & Innovation | No novelty or original ideas | Basic idea or standard approach | Some creative elements present | Creative solution with visible innovation | Highly original and forward-thinking |
| User Experience & Design | No UI/UX consideration | Some usability but inconsistent | Usable with good structure | Accessible and easy to use | Beautiful, polished, inclusive, engaging |
| Feasibility & Real-World Application | Not feasible or unrealistic | Some potential but not practical | Basic implementation possible | Feasible with refinement | Highly implementable with real impact |